Evergreen Data Collection Instruments

数据收集工具 

 

 

Using the Assessment Framework   ä½¿ç”¨è¯„估构架

Requires some basic background in measures and basic methods of collecting the required data
要求有关于评估方法和收集数据方法的基本知识

 

The Assessment Framework tells you which form is recommended to collect the required data for each indicator

          measure as well as how to calculate the data.

评估构架推荐了收集各项指标数据的相应工具以及如何对数据进行计算

 

Data Collection Instruments have been prepared in draft form
 
数据收集工具已有初稿
 
  • One of the instruments is a form to be completed by the library or school administrative staff: Administrative Statistics, which includes information collected from a tally of visits to the library over the course of a year

一种工具是由图书馆或学校管理人员填的表格: 行政数据统计表。它包括了图书馆一年的用户访问记录

另一种工具是由网上编目系统自动生成的信息：图书馆数据库统计数据

  • One instrument is a librarian interview form

一个工具是图书馆员访谈录

  • Another instrument is a focus group form

另一个工具是讨论组

  • Several of the forms are survey forms 

几种工具是调查表形式：

 
–Community survey 社区调查
 
–User library survey 用户图书馆调查
 
–Program survey: Class instruction 项目调查：讲座反馈
 
–Program survey: Early childhood literacy 项目调查：儿童早期教育项目
 
–Program survey: Agricultural activity 项目调查：农业活动
 
–Program survey: Cultural heritage program 项目调查：文化遗产项目
 
–Program survey: Integrated class information literacy assignment 项目调查：综合性的课堂信息技能
 
 

Four Basic Data Collecting Methods
四种基本数据收集方法 

 
•Surveys调查
•Observation观察
•Individual Interviews面谈
•Focus Groups讨论组
 
 
 

Measures è¯„估方法 

•Methods of collecting and analyzing data to determine levels of success   æ”¶é›†æ•°æ®å’Œåˆ†æžæ•°æ®çš„方法
 
 
•Good Measures are  å¥½çš„方法是：
 
 
–Valid – measure what you intend to measure (What does asking people if they are satisfied with the
 
               quality of service measure?)
 
 
–有效的 – 达到评估目的 (用户是否对服务质量满意？)
 
 
 
–Reliable – stable and dependable; interpreted in the same way by different respondents (Is classifying
                     
                     questions by information vs. research going to yield reliable results?)
 
 
–可靠的 – 稳定可靠；不同受访者理解一致 (研究结果是否可靠？)
 
–Practical – easy to collect; does not burden staff or respondents
 
–实用的 – 收集容易；不会对回答者造成负担

 

–  Useful – provides information to improve library services. Treat every question as a scarce resource,
                    like “gold”
 
–有用的 – 提供改善图书馆服务的有用信息。   对每一个问题都认真对待
 
 
 
Next part of the presentation presents the four basic methods and discusses the strengths and
weaknessesof each method.  Each method has strengths and weaknesses and understanding the
limitations is important in using your data effectively to determine library success.

下面将介绍评估的四种基本方法及各种方法的优缺点。了解这些优缺点是很重要的。

 

 

 

 

 

 


创建自: admin. 最后修改: 星期六 08 of 6月, 2013 06:46:36 MDT 作者 admin.
原始文件位于 https://evergreeneducation.org/wikipub/tiki-index.php?page=EEF_data_collection_instruments